Screwed Kenosha Style

Wisconsin statute: 767.25

(1j) Except as provided in sub. (1m), the court shall determine child support payments by using the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9).

(b) The financial resources of both parents.

(bp) The needs of each party in order to support himself or herself at a level equal to or greater than that established under 42 USC 9902 (2).

(c) If the parties were married, the standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not ended in annulment, divorce or legal separation.

(em) Extraordinary travel expenses incurred in exercising the right to periods of physical placement under s. 767.24.

(h) The tax consequences to each party.

(hm) The best interests of the child.

(hs) The earning capacity of each parent, based on each parent's education, training and work experience and the availability of work in or near the parent's community.

(4) The court shall order either party or both to pay for the support of any child of the parties who is less than 18 years old, or any child of the parties who is less than 19 years old if the child is pursuing an accredited course of instruction leading to the acquisition of a high school diploma or its equivalent.

(1j) Judge Mary K. Wagner refuses to use the % 49.22 standard. Read how she verbally one the January transcripts denied them.

(bp) Wagner never condsidered mine or my two boys need and put us below the poverty level.

(c.) Wagner only consideration was only to the five, but totally rejects the presence of the two boys that had the experience of being orphanaged by her decision. She forced my oldest to drop out from full time school to be able to buy food and shelter for him and his brother. "Compassionat" Judge Wagner considered them old and sufficient enough at 16 and 17 years of age.

(em) It is my responsibility for every inch of travel for placement. No meeting 1/2 way.

(h) My Ex. doesn't need even a full time job, but gets to chlaim the five even though I paid $18,000 in the first 22 months.

(hm) Best interest of the child?? For 2004 they only could see their Dad a total of 7 1/2 days?

(hs) Earning capacity of my Ex. is about $26,000 for a first year teacher in Kenosha, but Wagner refuses that and defies this statute.

(4) I had to force this rule down their throats before the  yreluctantly accepted it. The courts wanted to take my oldest son from my placement, because he turned 18.  Yet he was still in school.



back to Wisconsin Law page

Home | Story | Chain of Events | Letters from Prison | Cult
NO justice in Kenosha, Wisconsin | My Income
Once upon a time there was a Family | In the Newspaper
Child Abuse Tolerance in Kenosha | You Can Help | Wisconsin Law
Transcripts | eMail


Contact me at:

Bernie Tocholke
41391 Little Sand Rd.
Hinckley, MN 55037

 

 

 

 

 

Northwoods-Exposure.com

webmaster

© 2004 copyright Bernie Tocholke. All rights reserved.